Summary of actionable items for fall 2005 evaluations:

To be improved:
* Be sure lecture precedes HW due date
* In-class problems should be harder
* Writing down too many things
* Disorganized & confusing boardwork
* Handwriting sometimes hard to read
* Sometimes goes off topic
* Irrelevant examples
* Talks fast
* Sometimes mumbles
* Assumes too much prerequisite material of the students (students must already
  know the material; must already be good at math).
* Class discussion doesn't match homework
* Class discussion doesn't match exams
* Homework doesn't match exams
* Didn't explain certain steps
* Only grades 5 problems per assignment, even when more are assigned
* Would like study problems before the exam
* Allow more time for people to ask questions in class
* Makes mistakes on examples in class
* Could involve students more, e.g. by having them work problems on the board
* Exams and quizzes too long

Already good:
* Enthusiastic, energetic
* Easy-going & makes students laugh
* Knowledgeable
* Thoroughly understands the subject matter
* Accepts criticism
* Is respectful of students
* Is available for office hours
* Is available via e-mail
* 2-day lag between HW assignment date & due date
* Well-organized boardwork
* Tough but fair
* Gives written feedback on homework
* Conscientious (cares about student comprehension)
* Class discussion matches homework
* Makes sure everyone gets the material
* Clearly explained things in several different ways